Governance, Risk & Compliance
Risk registers, controls, incidents and regulatory obligations kept live and connected — not reassembled from scratch for every audit.
The problem
GRC is frequently practised as an annual reconstruction. Ahead of an audit, a team assembles the risk register, refreshes the control descriptions, collects evidence, and produces a coherent account of the control environment. Then the exercise stops until next year.
The account is accurate on the day it is delivered and decays immediately, because the controls sit in a document rather than in the operating model. The process changed in March; the control description did not.
Meanwhile regulatory obligations arrive continuously and land nowhere in particular. Somebody reads the circular, forms a view, and the scope of what it touches is established by memory rather than by tracing.
What we deliver
- A risk register connected to the processes and systems where each risk actually arises
- Control library mapped to the risks controlled and the processes carrying the control
- Regulatory obligations tracked and mapped to the policies and controls satisfying them
- Incident and issue management that feeds back into the risk picture
- Evidence maintained continuously rather than assembled for each audit
- Governance reporting that draws on the live model rather than a periodic snapshot
Signs you need this
- Audit preparation is a project rather than an export
- The risk register is reviewed on a schedule but not connected to operations
- Regulatory change scoping depends on who happens to remember what
- The same finding recurs because the remediation never reached the process
Risks, controls, incidents and obligations live in Mosaic connected to the processes, policies and systems they attach to, so the control environment is always current rather than periodically rebuilt.
See the platformRelated disciplines
Bring us your challenge.
Describe what is breaking down and we will map it against the six disciplines with you.
Start a brief